beammeup Uživatel je online | Předmět: RE:16.06.23 18:04:51 | #115317 (1)
However, she was fired not because she had anything personally to do with the incident, but because she refused to go along with the company's woke overreaction to the PR shit storm, which followed it. This is why the jury awarded her 26 million.You can read it again here:
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/06/14/business/starbucks-manager-racial-discrimination/index.html
Tak ja jsem na stejne strane s tebou ohledne neferoveho prpopusteni manazerky a ty se tu vztekas.
Jak pises, vyhazovat z prace manazery protoze jsou bili po incidentu s cernochama je podle tebe “woke”. Podle me tam bylo nekolik chyb:
- Manazerka nemela vyhodit ty cernochy.
- Starbuck nemel vyhodit mamazerku.
- Tech $26 milionu se mi zda trochu prehnane, ale to je jen muj nazor. Porovnavam to s tim co Dear Leader ma platit zenske kterou “sexualne zneuzil”. Znasilnil?
Ty se tu casto ohanis tim slovem "woke”, muzes mi vysvetlit co to presne
znamena?
Kdyz DeSantis, jako spravny diktator cenzuruje knihy ve skolnich knihovnach,
narizuje Disney World co mohou a nemohou delat, Kdyz GOP bojuje proti LGBTQ,
“drag queens” (presto, ze i kamarad tveho Dear Leadera, Rudy Giuliani, se
take prevlekal/prevleka? do “drag”). Nebo kdyz debilove rozstrili Bud Light?
Jsou take take “woke” a nebo nevis?

