Rozcestník >> Společnost a komunity >> Amerika, američané, americké zvyky

O čem to prosimtě plácáš? Vašek tu někoho psychicky týrá a nutí ho k sebevraždě?

srandomat: Hate speech IS free speech:

"The question of whether hate speech is free speech is a controversial and complex one in the United States. The Constitution protects the fundamental right to freedom of speech and the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that there is no 'hate speech' exception to this right".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech_in_the_United_States

https://www.peraltacitizen.com/hate-speech-is-free-speech-whether-we-like-it-or-not/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech

https://theracquet.org/5919/news/the-line-between-hate-speech-and-free-speech/

“Hate speech in the United States cannot be directly regulated by the government due to the fundamental right to freedom of speech protected by the Constitution.[1] While "hate speech" is not a legal term in the United States, the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that most of what would qualify as hate speech in other western countries is legally protected free speech under the First Amendment“.

“Hate speech generally is protected as free speech. The law is clear on that . . . There are instances where it might be unprotected – such as if it is a “true threat” or meets the legal definition of harassment. But under Supreme Court precedents the government cannot punish or exclude speech because it is hateful.”
Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean of Berkeley Law

"In some countries (such as the United States), hate speech is not a legal term. Additionally, in some countries (including the United States), much of what falls under the category of "hate speech" is constitutionally protected".

“The first amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the right to freedom of speech to all Americans, but many are asking, does this clause include hate speech. According to the American Library Association, there is no legal definition of hate speech. The website says, “Generally, however, hate speech is any form of expression through which speakers intend to vilify, humiliate, or incite hatred against a group or a class of persons.”

“While hate speech is protected by the first amendment, I wholeheartedly believe that while you have a right to say offensive things it doesn’t mean you should,” said the Chairwoman of the College Republicans chapter at University of Wisconsin – La Crosse Kerri Seyfert. “I think this is often misunderstood when groups such as [College Republicans] advocate for free speech, we understand that all speech is protected but in no way do we encourage being hateful.”

“Hate speech is subjective to the individual which is why there is no clear definition,” said Seyfert. “Not only is it protected by the first amendment but because it is so broadly defined it would be impossible to put any sort of restrictions on it.”

SO SHUT YOUR FUCKING TRAP!!

srandomat: ... and what constitutes the aforementioned speech regulation by the government and private institutions is in fact censorship.

1. Nevim kterou "aforementioned speech regulation" mas na mysli (jsi lajdak, nepopises presni o co jde).
2. Snad nechces, ty ”Zdiskreditovanej lháři”, abych bral tve placani jako nejakou hodnotu? Co ty zde vyblijes je nepodstatne a uz me docela nudis ty cenzuro.
3. 

” srandomat: Hate speech IS free speech:”
Dik za informaci, ale o tom tu nebyla vubec rec ty vemeno. Ty zde davas rozkazy jako general kdo ma a nema psat a pri tom ty seres uplne mimo misu … debile. Pro tebe je daleko vyhodnejsi SHUT YOUR FUCKING TRAP!! aby jsi se nemusel soustavne ztrapnovat ty bebile. Jsi smutny pripad. Kdyz chces zde poucovat/vytahovat se, tak se nejdriv sam musis naucit pozorne cist, vstrebat ctenou latku, kriticky se and tim zamyslet a SHUT YOUR FUCKING TRAP!! aby jsi zase nenapsal nejakou hovadinu … ty vysokoskolaku. Ze ty jsi v te vysoke skole pucoval studentum hajzly a diplom mas namalovany na hajzl papiru? Priznej se … to by odpovidalo

Tak si jeste jednou precti ty Einstejne, co jsem napsal GalvestonTX a hledej slovo “hate” a nebo “nenavist”. Kdyz nahodou nenajdes, tak by ti melo dojit, ze jsi blbej. Pro uplnnost, ja jsem Andrejce ani tobe nic nepsal o psychickem tyrani, to bylo tak vseobecne … koukni se jeste jednou

To bylo o tomhle:
“The First Amendment does not protect speech that leads to imminent lawless action. This kind of speech has to be directed towards a specific person or group. It has to be a direct call to commit immediate, lawless action. There must be an expectation that the speech will in fact lead to lawless action.”

Vis?

P.S. Ty jsi chlastal kdyz jsi to psal … ty “hate” krame?

The First Amendment protects all speech.
Says so SCOTUS.

Again, the notion that speech by itself can hurt a person has no legal basis, either in criminal law or in the US Constitution and is merely a liberal snowflake construct, which means that no form of speech, including the so called hate speech can be proscribed or regulated by the government. Private entities are free to impose whatever rules they want on their employees, but they are not protected from litigation in the way that government institutions are. Come back here after you do some reading on this subject!