V této diskuzi se objevují odkazy a příspěvky obsahující vulgarismy.
beammeup Uživatel je online | Předmět: RE: RE: RE: RE:před 16 hodinami | #102010 (4)
The First Amendment protects all speech.
Says so SCOTUS.
Again, the notion that speech by itself can hurt a person has no legal basis, either in criminal law or in the US Constitution and is merely a liberal snowflake construct, which means that no form of speech, including the so called hate speech can be proscribed or regulated by the government. Private entities are free to impose whatever rules they want on their employees, but they are not protected from litigation in the way that government institutions are. Come back here after you do some reading on this subject!
Mohl jsi nam tu nechat odkaz odkud jsi to okopiroval … to rozumni lide
delaji. :)
https://diskuze.chatujme.cz/spolecnost-komunity/amerika-americane-americke-zvyky-t443?paginator-page=1761#
Promin, ze jsem te nechal koupat v tech tvych srackach co tu vypravis, ale drive jsem nemel cas. Tak jsem se vratil na tve pozvani ti pripomenou jaka jsi neschopna, blba a prolhana kupa hnoje.
Tohle je samozrejme hovadina, ale co jineho od tebe ocekavat? 
The First Amendment protects all speech.
Says so SCOTUS. (SCOTUS = the Supreme Court of the United States).
”United States free speech exceptions”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech_exceptions
“In the United States, some categories of speech are not protected by the
First Amendment. According to the Supreme Court
of the United States, the U.S. Constitution protects free speech while allowing limitations on certain categories of
speech.” Hej beammeup, ty vemeno, limitation znamena ne vsechno a to co placas o “Private
entities are free to impose whatever rules they want on their employees” je
trapne protoze to kazdy vi a o tom tu nebyla vubec rec.
Kdyby jsem mel duveru, ze tomu clanku muzes porozumet (je to slozitejsi nezli pocitani procent nebo spocitat rozdil v inflaci s kteryma mas problem), tak bych ti poradil aby jsi si ten clanek precetl. Ale vim, ze to neudelas, tak alespon tohle:
- Podněcování k sebevraždě neni chranene 1st amendment.
- False statements of fact … defamation
- In the defamation (hanobeni) case Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. (1974)
- Pravicacka stanice “FOX NOICE” od 2020 voleb omyva hlavy Magaturds (i zdejsich) a hanobili firmu Dominion ktera vyrabi elektronicke volebni pocitace. FOX je ted souzeny firmou Dominion pro $1,6 miliard a jejich nekteri hlasatele take.
- Vydelavat na hudbbe, pisnich, knihach, i jen clancich bez placeni royalties?
Jestli jsi odvadel praci ve skole tak nerozumim jak jsi mohl dostat diplom.
Ty jsi tu diskuzi zvladl na urovni uklizece hajzlu. 
