V této diskuzi se objevují odkazy a příspěvky obsahující vulgarismy.
GalvestomTX Uživatel je offline | Předmět: RE:21.04.23 13:19:12 | #108627 (1)
,,bro,, rikej tem koel tebe....vime komuo tech pripadech 1,2,3 vis kulovy...ja kuprikladu vim ze ,,1,, bylo jinak nez se pise v mediich,temer na 100% bude strelec uznan nevinnej. Volnost zbrani prinasi pozitiva ale i negativa...a take svobodu ... vse je na vahach a je najivny se domnivat ze se nestanou i spatny veci...jde jen o to jestli je to prinosem nebo ne...a prinosem to je i bez toho aby jsi na vahu postavil nejtezssi polozku a to svobodu!
o tech pripadech 1,2,3 vis kulovy...ja kuprikladu vim
ze ,,1,, bylo jinak nez se pise v mediich,temer na 100% bude strelec uznan
nevinnej. Volnost zbrani prinasi pozitiva ale i negativa...a take svobodu ...
vse je na vahach a je najivny se domnivat ze se nestanou i spatny veci...jde jen
o to jestli je to prinosem nebo ne...a prinosem to je i bez toho aby jsi na vahu
postavil nejtezssi polozku a to svobodu! 
- Bro, ja tam nebyl a tak nevim na 100% presne jak to bylo. Je uzasne, ze ty
jsi tam taky nebyl, ale vsechno vis na temer 100% a to asi z podvodnych zdroju
ktere jsou obvineni z lhani a jeden tvuj “zdroj”, FOX, se jiz s Dominion
dohodl, ze zaplati za lhani $787.5 milionu. Oni vedi, ze nejsi nejostrejsi nuz v
supliku, vedi, ze primitivni mysl zvlada jen primitivni zpravy. Jestli je ale pravda, ze ta holka couvala a on ji
zastrelil tak to ma pruser. Predstav si, ze by se to stalo tobe
- Co vis o pripadu 2 a 3? Chci si to ulozit a pozdeji ti pripomenout vysledky.
- Volnost zbrani prinasi take smrt nevinnych lidi. Je treba je regulovat … treba jako motorova vozidla.
- Myslis, ty naivko, ze kdyz bude “gun control” (coz chce 80% Americanu), se bude vic a nebo mene nevivvych mrtvych?
- Jaky je prinos zbrani? Bylo by to v poradku kdyby jsi vjel do spatneho vjezdu, zazconil na spatne dvere, vlezl omylem do ciziho auta a majitel by te “svobodne zastrelil”? Ty primitivni svobodo?
- Nez se zase budes rozcilovat and oslovenim “bro” o kterem “vime komu” se tak rika, ale ty nevis, tak si to nejdriv vygoogluj.
Did the assault weapons ban of 1994 bring down mass shootings?
Here’s what the data tells us
https://ohiocapitaljournal.com/2022/06/15/did-the-assault-weapons-ban-of-1994-bring-down-mass-shootings-heres-what-the-data-tells-us/
During the 1994-2004 ban:
In the years after the assault weapons ban went into effect, the number of
deaths from mass shootings fell, and the increase in the annual number of
incidents slowed down. Even including 1999’s Columbine High School massacre
– the deadliest mass shooting during the period of the ban – the 1994 to
2004 period saw lower average annual rates of both mass shootings and deaths
resulting from such incidents than before the ban’s inception.
From 2004 onward:
The data shows an almost immediate – and steep – rise in mass shooting
deaths in the years after the assault weapons ban expired in 2004.
Breaking the data into absolute numbers, between 2004 and 2017 – the last year of our analysis – the average number of yearly deaths attributed to mass shootings was 25, compared with 5.3 during the 10-year tenure of the ban and 7.2 in the years leading up to the prohibition on assault weapons.
More than 11,500 people killed in gun violence so far in
2023
https://abcnews.go.com/US/116-people-died-gun-violence-day-us-year/story?id=97382759
** United States military casualties in the War in Afghanistan**
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_military_casualties_in_the_War_in_Afghanistan
