Anti-racism is WOKE
LGBQ is WOKE
Censoring classic literature is WOKE
You need to be a little more specific:
Race-baiting is woke. In your face homosexuality is woke. Teaching kids that they may not be what they think they are in grade school is woke.
srandomat:
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Race-baiting
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=in%20your%20face
Zastanci WOKE jsou nejvetsi svine v USA a jejich likvidaci bych jedine
podporil....jakoliv !

Na tebe se neda ani nastvat, Andrejko
. Blbi lide za to nemohou jaci jsou …
Buh je takove stvoril a tebe navic stvoril s Q uchylkou (Q ze zkratky
LGBTQIA).
Tu svini ti neoplatim … to je hazeni perel svinim

Ty nam zde denne dokazujes, ze to mas v hlave naprosto vyhrabane a vis o
“woke” naproste hovno. Neumis si uvedomit, ze to “woke” propaguje
nepritel tveho Dear Leader protoze ho chce dostat od valu. Snazi se priklonit
ignoranty jako jsi ty na svoji stranu a tak si na vas vymyslel “a culture
war” ... vi, zbosnujete nenavidet
. Snazi se odvratit vasi pozornost od ekonomie
(infalce jde dolu, nezamestnanst nizka, benzin $3:25, DOW vyletela z urovne Dear
Leader prez 50%). Vasi vudci vaspotebujou udrzovat zblbli aby jste bojovali za
jejich moc a bohatstvi … na vas samozrejme serou.
Dal jsi par ukazek co ty si myslis, ze je “woke” … tak se na to podivejme:
Note 1 … Queer:
denoting or relating to a sexual or gender identity that does not correspond to
established ideas of sexuality and gender, especially heterosexual norms.)
Note 2 …
Harris County leaders working to change the narrative on banned
books
https://www.khou.com/article/news/education/harris-county-banned-books-library/285-2988d28b-ea89-4263-8ad3-c024e0bcba99
“HARRIS COUNTY, Texas — During National Banned Books Week, Harris County
leaders are showcasing where you can find books that have ended up on a
district's banned book list.”
“Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and state lawmaker Rep. Matt Krause campaigned in
2021 to investigate a list of around 850 books that ""might make
.{color: red}" students feel discomfort, guilt, anguish, or any other form of
psychological distress because of their race or sex," in a letter first
reported by Texas Tribune.” [Chudaci pravicacke deti! To nejde vylecit s
AR-15?
]
"Classic literature" kterou nam tu beammeup casto
pripomina.
Orwell’s “1984” was challenged for its pro-communist and sexually explicit
content, alongside other subversive and dystopian stories such as Orwell’s
“Animal Farm” and Alduous Huxley’s “Brave New World,” but has since
become known as one of the most significant rationalizations for freedom of
speech and expression.
Vygoogluj so to. A dost … je toho na tebe moc.

srandomat: "Orwell’s “1984” was challenged for its pro-communist and sexually explicit content"
Was challenged by whom? By the Tennessee school board? For its pro-communist content? Does this leftard (who wrote the article) really think that 1984 was pro-communist? Do you think 1984, the Brave New World and the Animal Farm were pro-communist? I think these books illustrated quite the opposite - the perniciousness of leftist group think.
"Kdo neni s nami, je proti nam". To prece rikali komunisti.
Názorová konformita je jednou z fundamentalnich zasad současného
liberalismu. Coz cini tenhle oxymoron "almost comical in its irony" ve slovech
toho vemena co ten clanek napsal.
BTW, ten tvuj citat není z článku, na který jsi odkázal, musel jsem si ten spravnej sam vyguglovat. Nice try.
Ano, komuniste rikali "Kdo neni s nami, je proti nam". To se papouskovalo lidma kteri meli strach, jak Andrejka se tu zminila, ze to bylo nutne pro zamestnani. Ostatni to (a jine) vykrikovalo s nadsenim, tak jako ty dnes vykrikujes, ze volby byly ukradene, prevrat byla turisticka prohlidka zavreneho Kongresu, Dear Leader mel "perfektni" rozhovor se Zelenskym kdyz ho vydiral ... drzel zbrane odhlasovane Kongresem (Der Leader nemel kontrolu pres ty zbrane) za vykonstruovani lzi/bahno na Presidenta Bidena.
Ano, my liberalove jsme celkem vsichni pro Amewriku beze lzi, bez podvodu,
bez zradcu, bez rasismu. Demokrate jsou pro dobre zivotni prostredi pro vsechny,
ne jen pro ty nejbohatsi, propaguji konkurenci misto monopoly/obligatory,
omezit hromadna strileni na Americanu ulicich, zarucit zenam pravo na sve telo
(podobne jako anti-vaxxers) ... atd. Proste chceme slusny zivot pro vsechny a
neni divu, ze prevazna vetsina s nami souhlasi.

"Ano, my liberalove jsme celkem vsichni pro Amewriku beze lzi, bez podvodu, bez zradcu, bez rasismu."
... a bez jakékoliv nazorové rozmanitosti. Cokoli nesouhlasí s vaším levicackym katechizmem, je okamžitě označeno jako "velka lež". T takovem politickem klimatu je jakákoli smysluplna výměna názorů naprosto nemožná. Protoze kdo neni s vami, je proti vam.
Omlouvam se, ze jsem se seknul a dobre jsi udelal, ze jsi si to vygoogloval.

A zase jsme ztroskotali na absenci tveho critickeho mysleni ... ty righturd !
"While this groundbreaking novel has a place of honor as a PBS Great American Read Top 100 Pick, it also maintains its status as the most banned book of all time in America. Why was it banned? Its social and political themes were found to be too controversial, and its sexual content was deemed inappropriate. In 1981, Jackson County, Florida challenged the book for being pro-communism. Considering large portions of the text are not only anti-communist but in fact anti-government all together, this challenge seems like a bit of a stretch. Furthermore, the book was based on the very real political climate of Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia, warning against the totalitarianism that caused so much suffering in those countries and the regions over which they had influence."
Jestli tomuhle nerozumis, PEPE, tak to vzdavam

1981 was 42 years ago. The political climate at the end of the Carter administration was totally different to be used in this context. Besides, the reason why this book was not recommended for school-age children had nothing to do with its message, but only with its style:
"Despite its importance as a dystopian classic and its prominence within popular culture to the present day, 1984 is a commonly challenged book in school libraries because of objections to its content. The book features violent acts and explicit sexual themes. Scenes such as Winston's fantasizing about raping and killing Julia, the sexual relationship between Winston and Julia outside of marriage, or the graphic tortures threatened in Room 101 (such as Winston having his face chewed off by rats) are enough to get the book repeatedly challenged by concerned parents who believe the book is too mature for their children to read even within a classroom setting"
I can name dozens of books, starting with some of the classics by Mark Twain or Harriet Beecher Stowe that are shunned in todays classrooms for their message, which is not consistent with woke historical revisionism of todays curriculum.