gdyby mu to zarucilo prdon tak by to hned vzal! jenze voino hovno...
Ty jsi to necetl cele, nebo se to to nehodilo do kramu?
“Other legal proceedings may examine the propriety of his statements and actions while he was the President and whether, as the plaintiffs in this and other cases contend, it was this conduct which served as the actual threat to our democracy,” Erdos ruled. “But this case is not the proper place to do so. Here, Trump is entitled to Presidential immunity.”
To znamena, ze jeho soud neni spravne misto pro tento pripad ... to se musi resit jinde (vyssi soud?). Tedy jestli to neni vyresene, pak to neni vitezstvi, jen kopl "the proverbial can down the road".
Pockame si na konecne vyreseni … Presidential immunity ma sve hranice.
(Mimochodem nenasel jsem o tom nikde jinde ani zminku
.) Rekneme, ze by se to stalo tobe …
president by te obvinil z neceho co neni pravda a ty by jsi dostaval vyhruzky
smrti ktere ovlivni tve zdravi. Take by jsi jasal jako jasas nad touto zpravou?
Souhlasis snad, ze president muze za jeho vlady pachat zlociny a nic se mu
nestane? Smi te treba bezduvodne a beztrestne zastrelit na 5. Avenue?
. Samozrejme, ze v demokracii
ne. Takovou immunitu ma jen kral … a P01135809 by ji mohl mit kdyby
nahodou vyhral/ukradl volby. Pak by te mohl zastrelit kdykoliv a kdekoliv
. Nedivil by jsi se take kdyby ten mokry sen
nejakeho 75ti leteho soudce zustal nadale jen mokrym snem? Vlastne v 75ti letech
uz asi mokre sny nejsou … tak jen blouzni.
