https://www.city-journal.org/html/california-poverty-capital-15659.html
"Self-interest in the social-services community may be at work here. If California’s poverty rate should ever be substantially reduced by getting the typical welfare client back into the workforce, many bureaucrats could lose their jobs. As economist William A. Niskanen explained back in 1971, public agencies seek to maximize their budgets, through which they acquire increased power, status, comfort, and job security. In order to keep growing its budget, and hence its power, a welfare bureaucracy has an incentive to expand its “customer” base—to ensure that the welfare rolls remain full and, ideally, growing. With 883,000 full-time-equivalent state and local employees in 2014, according to Governing, California has an enormous bureaucracy—a unionized, public-sector workforce that exercises tremendous power through voting and lobbying. Many work in social services".
Ja nevim co myslis tim mym vyjadrovanim, ja jsem jen napsal otazku aniz bych
klapacku pouzil: “Co kdy pravicaci/Repu¬blikani udelali pro tyhle
nestastne lidi? Jake mas reseni? Predloz nejake napady a udelejme s tim
neco." Pripomen mi … je Kalifornie cerveny a nebo modry stat? Ja jen, ze jsem
se ptal na Republikany a ty jsi se rozepsal o tom jak to mate s bezdomovcema v
Kalifornii. Urcite to ma nejakou sovislost ktera mi unika. Ty tu stale lidem
vytykas, ze se nedrzi tematu tak urcite by jsi to sam nedelal
.
Zda se, ze vis proc tam mate bezdomovce a to z duvodu jineho nez klima.
“Why don't you sink your teeth into this?” a napis proc.
Nenapinej ! 
Government social services racket je zrovna tak spolecensky cizopasný jako
vojensko-průmyslový komplex.
Mnohem vic v tom smyslu ze predstavuje daleko vetsi podil celkove ekonomiky.
Degenerovanej debile, neopovidej na optazku otazkou. My vime ze mas honno.