V této diskuzi se objevují odkazy a příspěvky obsahující vulgarismy.
beammeup Uživatel je offline | Předmět: RE:před 6 hodinami | #51062 (1)
Look at it this way: Absence of evidence is not the the same as evidence of absence. If Trump had an irrefutable proof of fraud in the last election, he would today be the president, as nightmarish as that idea must seem to people like you.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Stale me prekvapujes tvoji blbosti. Toto je nejaky argument?
“If Trump had an irrefutable proof of fraud in the last election, he
would today be the president, as nightmarish as that idea must seem to people
like you.”
Delas si prdel?
1. “If” znamena, ze Dear leader mel hovno a ne dukaz. Vsech 50 statu certifikovalo, i po nekolikanasobnem prepocitavani hlasu, ze 2020 volby byly spravne zabezpecene a bez podvodu ktere by mohly ovlivnit vysledek voleb.
Look at this thisway: Pres to, ze Dear Leader a jeho kumpanove
slibovali/slibuji dukazy tisice podvodu, zadny podvod nebyl nalezen … absence
of evidence filozofe 
Vysledek: Trump lost.
“The November 3rd election was the most secure in American
history. Right now, across the country, election officials are
reviewing and double-checking the entire election process prior to finalizing
the result,”
(To by melo lidi jako ty uklidnit.)
2. Ano, kdyby mel nezvratny dukaz podvodu ve volbach ktere by ovlivnili
vyslkedek voleb, tak by se mi to nelibilo (jako v 2016), ale uznal bych, ze
vyhral volby. Take verim, ze President Biden by to uznal sam, jako Gore conceded
v roce 2000.
3. Ano, je to nightmarish myslenka, ze by Dear Leader byl President. A fungovalo
to. Dear Leader vystrasil lide jako jsem ja a vsichni jsme volili proti nemu.
Jelikoz nas je vic, tak DL volby prohral .... tecka 
