V této diskuzi se objevují odkazy a příspěvky obsahující vulgarismy.
At z toho vyplyne co z toho vyplyne, nebudou to mit inkvizitoři te vysetrovaci komise lehky:
Citat z clanku:
"As in most white collar crime cases, experts said the biggest challenge for prosecutors would be proving that Trump had criminal intent — that he knew he had lost the election but pursued his fraud claims anyway".
"It’s well-established that a president who once suggested that people could inject themselves with disinfectant to deter Covid has embraced some strange ideas (he later said he was being "sarcastic."), Trump has said he genuinely believes the election was stolen from him, and that all his statements and actions were made in good faith".
Demokraté nemohou tudiz mít pravdu v obojím - presvedcovat lidi že Trump je blazen, a na druhé straně tvrdit, že jednal v souvislosti s tou vzpourou s kriminálním úmyslem. Kdyz opravdu veril ze vysledky tech voleb byly zfixovany (tak ja jsem tomu veril ja), tak z ničeho byt obviněn nemuze.
A pak musej brat na vedomi i tohle (opet citat):
"Filing criminal charges against Trump in connection with his efforts to overturn the election “will very likely spark civil unrest, and maybe even civil war,” said Barbara McQuade, an NBC legal analyst and a former U.S. attorney."
Paklize ucel toho divadla je ciste jen politicky (znemoznit Trumpovi opetnou kandidaturu), tak musej byt Demokrati velmi opatrni.
Rekni mi radsi v cem s temito uzavery nesouhlasis. Ten zdroj ja doufam ze
kritizovat nebudes. 
1