Nezvatlej. Masli nejakou vyznamnou pointu, tak sem s ni. Jinak zalez.
Nezvatlej. Masli nejakou vyznamnou pointu, tak sem s ni. Jinak zalez.
Jeee … ty tu buzerujes cleny diskuze, ze pisi bez dukazu a ne to co by jsi
chtel cist presto, ze prskas jak ta luza nepracovita saje z cecku statu a
Demokrate jim to plati. Sam ale nenapises po 5. vyzve ja by jsi napsal jak ty a
tvi pravicacti geniove tuto situaci resili. TY JEN MEKTAS A MEKTAS ... ty
vyznamna pointo.
Jedine reseni ekonomicke zavislosti je udelat ji co nejvíc nežádoucí a ponižující. Coz je presny opak toho co delaj Demokrati, kteri socialni programy vyuzivaj k vytvareni zarucenych volicu. Masli vskutku zajem se o tomhle nejak poucit, precti si tenhle clanek:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_Responsibility_and_Work_Opportunity_Act#:~:text=Passage%20in%20104th%20Congress,-President%20Bill%20Clinton&text=A%20central%20pledge%20of%20Clinton's,had%20emerged%20on%20welfare%20reform.
"The law was a cornerstone of the Republican Party's "Contract with America"
Most of the provisions of this reform act were picked apart and invalidated by Democrat majorities in Congress since then. There are no work requirements to receive continued public assistance in federal law today. The Republican instituted work requirements interfered with the Democrat strategy of captive electorate, which is why they were dropped.
BTW, Bill Clinton s timhle nemel nic spolecnyho, akorat ze Republikanum ten zakon tenkrat podepsal. Protoze to nebyl takovej bolsevizmem vypatlanej magor jako ses ty.
4 . Tak se ptam opet, Einsteine a udajne vysokoskolaku, jake reseni mas dnes ty a ti tvi prskajici podvodni pravicacti geniusove? Z me strany to vypada, ze mas/mate hovno, jen te situace vyuzivate/zneuzivate jako "raw meat" pro vase ignoranty.